[stack] Tribute to Slava Pestov

[maggethun]

Dear Friends,

my health has been going down rapidly for a while,
I could no longer travel to my Uni, barely coped
with looking after myself, until I decided to go
into a home where I am treated exceptionally well.
I got myself a computer, internet, email again
with username phimvt, but provided by google (gmail).
So, this is my first email to the group.

La Trobe has re-organised all its web pages according
to some templates imposed from above. That meant that
a lot, not just mine, became disconnected and resulted
in many dead links all over the web. After some quite
exhausting negotiations my own pages were reconnected
with a small change: the "philosophy" part of my
pages is no longer operative. My homepage is now
www.latrobe.edu.au/phimvt/
and the Joy pages just have "joy/" appended.

I want to use this my first email to the group to do
what I should have done years ago. Slava Pestov has
designed and implemented his Factor language over
quite some time now. The result is a most impressive
piece of work. The design goes well beyond what I
ever dreamed of for Joy, and the implementation is
professional and clearly far superior than that of Joy.
There is already a huge library for all sorts of things.
And, very importantly, there are many users who are
contributing in one way or another.

So, Slava, this is my tribute to your work. I also
want to congratulate you on your Master's. I tried
to read some early bits of your thesis, but had to
look up "direct sum of vector spaces", and shortly
after that I just gave up. Anyhow, well done.

And what should happen to Joy? With a far superior
alternative around, it would be pointless for me
to patch up the existing Joy either as the language
or in the implementation. Besides, I am too frail
now and don't have the energy for any major project.
Should somebody else design a kind of Joy2? Maybe,
but probably not. It would have to be significantly
different from Factor to make it worthwhile. But I
don't know Factor well enough to say what could be
different enough for that. However, I do think that
in the Joy libraries there are a few techniques
(especially continuations to implement backtracking)
that are useful. Maybe these should be translated
into Factor.

I hope all you members of the group are thriving.
I'll be around again!

- Manfred

[John Carter]

Post by maggethun
Dear Friends,
my health has been going down rapidly for a while,

I am very sorry to read this, take care of yourself!

Post by maggethun
So, Slava, this is my tribute to your work.

What generous spirit!

Post by maggethun
Anyhow, well done.

Indeed, Slava's work is a major accomplishment.

Post by maggethun
And what should happen to Joy?

The Joy of Joy to me was always it's startling simplicity.

It was a much needed clarion call indicating, nay DEMONSTRATING, that
the march to ever more complex languages is ill advised.

Even better, Joy demonstrated that simplicity carried deep value.

As such I hope it is always around to admonish the industry.

Post by maggethun
Besides, I am too frail
now and don't have the energy for any major project.

Take it easy, and many thanks for your many contributions and your
kind, gentle and ever informative replies to me and others over the years.



--
John Carter                             Phone : [phone]
Tait Electronics                        Fax   : (64)(3) 359 4632
PO Box 1645 Christchurch                Email : ***@taitradio.com
New Zealand
--
John Carter                             Phone : [phone]
Tait Electronics                        Fax   : (64)(3) 359 4632
PO Box 1645 Christchurch                Email : ***@taitradio.com
New Zealand
=======================================================================
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee. It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
lost by reason of this transmission.
If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
other act on the email.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
altered or corrupted during transmission.
=======================================================================

[pml060912]

Post by John Carter

Post by maggethun
Dear Friends,

.
.
.

Post by John Carter

Post by maggethun
And what should happen to Joy?

The Joy of Joy to me was always it's startling simplicity.
It was a much needed clarion call indicating, nay DEMONSTRATING, that
the march to ever more complex languages is ill advised.
Even better, Joy demonstrated that simplicity carried deep value.
As such I hope it is always around to admonish the industry.

I tried to take that even further, in my work on Furphy (see http://users.beagle.com.au/peterl/furphy.html). But with that I was not aiming at a language directly, but on the one hand to see if the testbed approach gave rise to features that might be useful in Forth (I think it did, but not very useful), and on the other hand I wanted to strip the basis down to the simplest possible to ensure consistency and fewer special cases to test during implementation - but after that I wanted to put syntactic sugar on for programmer convenience. It looks uncomfortably impractical without that syntactic sugar, though it has all the power necessary, and in fact ANY source compiles to something if there is no syntactic sugar. P.M.Lawrence.